Wisconsin Fake Elector Settlement – Scheme Origins & Replication Across States

A settlement was reached in the fake elector case, revealing extensive details about the scheme’s origins in Wisconsin and its replication in six other states, including Georgia. The settlement involved the release of over 1,400 pages of documents, emails, and text messages.

Wisconsin Fake Elector Settlement

On March 4, 2024, a settlement was reached in a Wisconsin fake elector lawsuit, providing new details on the strategy employed by then-President Donald Trump’s attorneys to challenge the 2020 election results. 

Kenneth Chesebro and Jim Troupis, two attorneys representing Trump, orchestrated a plan for fake electors to file false paperwork claiming Trump won Wisconsin, despite losing to Democratic candidate Joe Biden by fewer than 21,000 votes. 

The settlement involved the release of over 1,400 pages of emails, text messages, and other documents, which revealed the scheme’s origins in Wisconsin and its replication in six other states, including Georgia, where Chesebro has already pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the 2020 election

• Credit Karma $3 Million Settlement Update
• Walmart Weighted Goods Settlement
• Google Referrer Header Settlement Payout
• Facebook Settlement Check
• Allianz Settlement Payout Date
• Apple Settlement Payout

Consequences of the Wisconsin Fake Elector Case

The consequences of the Wisconsin fake elector case are significant and multifaceted, impacting various aspects of the political and legal landscape:

Legal Ramifications:

• The fake elector efforts are central to an August federal indictment against former President Donald Trump, alleging he attempted to overturn the 2020 election results.
• Federal prosecutors investigating January 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riots have highlighted the scheme’s origins in Wisconsin.
• Michigan and Nevada have criminally charged fake electors, although there is no known criminal investigation in Wisconsin.
• The settlement in Wisconsin involved civil lawsuits against two attorneys and 10 Republicans, with no admission of wrongdoing or liability but a commitment from the attorneys to never participate in such actions again.

Political Impact:

• The fake elector scheme has perpetuated efforts to “decertify” the 2020 election, increase legislative power over election administration, and disband election commissions in Wisconsin.
• These actions have fueled justifications for extremist behaviour, such as the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021, where individuals sought to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject votes cast by legitimate electors.

Legal Accountability:

• Efforts are ongoing to hold perpetrators accountable under state law in Wisconsin for falsely assuming to act as public officers, misconduct in public office, simulating legal processes, conspiracy to commit criminal acts, and other charges.
• State prosecutions are seen as crucial alongside federal investigations to ensure all implicated parties are brought to justice and prevent individuals from evading accountability.

The outcome of the Wisconsin Fake Elector Case

The outcome of the Wisconsin fake elector case involved a settlement that shed light on the intricate details of the scheme orchestrated by two attorneys for then-President Donald Trump. 

Kenneth Chesebro and Jim Troupis devised a plan for fake electors to submit false paperwork claiming that Trump had won Wisconsin, despite losing to Democratic candidate Joe Biden by fewer than 21,000 votes.

Key points from the settlement include:

• The attorneys turned over more than 1,400 pages of documents, emails, and text messages, providing a detailed account of the scheme’s origins in Wisconsin and its replication in six other states, including Georgia.
• The settlement resolved a civil lawsuit brought by Democrats in 2022 against the two attorneys and 10 Republicans in Wisconsin, with no admission of fault or liability but a commitment from Chesebro and Troupis to never engage in such actions again.
• The documents show how the two strategize ways to delay deadlines for certifying electoral votes and sway public opinion, including floating ideas on conservative talk radio.
• Troupis agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to the plaintiffs as part of the settlement.
• The attorneys did not admit to liability or culpability for their roles in the elector strategy.

Terms of the Settlement in the Wisconsin Fake Elector Case

The terms of the settlement in the Wisconsin fake elector case, as outlined in the search results, include:

Agreements:

• The settlement involved agreements that did not include an admission of fault or liability by the attorneys involved, Kenneth Chesebro and Jim Troupis.
• The attorneys committed to never engage in similar actions again as part of the settlement.

Document Disclosure:

• Kenneth Chesebro and Jim Troupis turned over more than 1,400 pages of documents, emails, text messages, photos, and videos as part of the settlement, offering a detailed account of the scheme’s origins in Wisconsin and its replication in six other states, including Georgia.

Legal Accountability:

• The settlement resolved a civil lawsuit brought by Democrats against the two attorneys and 10 Republicans in Wisconsin.
• There was no admission of wrongdoing or liability in the agreements reached as part of the settlement.

Financial Obligation:

• Jim Troupis agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to the plaintiffs as part of the settlement.